Volunteers of Essendon and Flemington, 1914-1918
Morgan A J Pte 3179 Albert Joseph 22 Inf Bn 18 Apprentice boilermaker Single C of E
Address: Essendon, Primrose St, 100
Next of Kin: Morgan, Albert J, father, 100 Primrose St, Essendon
Enlisted: 26 Jul 1915
Embarked: A73 Commonwealth 26 Nov 1915
Prior Service: 58th Senior Cadets, still serving
Returned to Australia, 17 Mar 1917 7th Battalion, Private.
A SUGGESTION.
To the Editor of "The Advocate."
Sir,—As one of the many hundreds of "diggers" who accepted the invitation
last week, I was highly gratified with the "Welcome Home" extended
to us by the Catholic Women's Club. However, as another is to be held, I
desire to offer a humble suggestion. Make the musical programme Australian
and military. The absence of such in last week's programme marred
an otherwise splendid evening. We expected to find the Australian flag in
the place of honour, but found its place usurped by the Union Jack, and
for a few minutes by the Irish flag. Surely one of our many (though
none official) National Anthems could have been rendered, also "Australia
Will Be there" and "The Rose of No Man's Land"; and would not C. J.
Dennis' "Singing Soldiers" have been appropriate? Perhaps it will be said
that these are not classics, but they are popular, and would have roused
enthusiasm. And inexplicable also was the omission of "Home, Sweet
Home," which would have more fittingly concluded the programme than
"God Save Ireland" in the circumstances. My motto is: Everything in its own
time and in its own place - Yours, etc.,
A.J. MORGAN
7th Battalion.
Essendon, 14/7/19
A SUGGESTION. (1919, July 19). Advocate
(Melbourne, Vic. : 1868 - 1954), p. 17. R
http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article170945452
CORRESPONDENCE WELCOME HOME TO CATHOLIC SOLDIERS.
To the Editor of "The Advocate."
Sir,—In your issue of 19th inst. appeared a letter over the signature of
one A. J. Morgan, Essendon, complaining of the absence of Australian
and military items at Catholic Welcome Home in Town Hall on 10th
inst.
As a returned digger—and I feel sure I am backed by a great majority
of my comrades—our tastes could not have been better suited. If the writer
has no idea of music, then I'm sorry for him; but what could have been
better received than were the splendid items of the artists who so kindly
contributed? I feel sure Mrs. Knowles and committee could not do better
than give as near as possible the same programme on next occasion.
As for military items, nothing is so objectionable to a dinkum soldier.
Surely we had enough of that class of music during four years of war, and
the committee showed good judgment in omitting them, especially now that
we have peace and have come home longing for something to make us forget
military and the hell we have been through. "God Save Ireland" also
seems to have displeased the writer; but if he is not Irish—well, that's his
misfortune, not the fault of the committee.—Yours, etc.,
ERIC CARROLL.
Kew, 21/7/19.
CORRESPONDENCE (1919, July 26). Advocate
(Melbourne, Vic. : 1868 - 1954), p. 25.
http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article170945886
CATHOLIC SOLDIERS' WELCOME HOME.
To the Editor of "The Advocate."
Sir,—It was only after representation from many friends, whose spokesman I
became, that I ventured to offer the suggestion in your columns. My contention
was that the programme should have been Australian, and with a military
flavour. Mr. Carroll's reference to the nausea caused by war memories is
naught but a fine mock-heroic, nor does his opinion of the programme prove
that he is musical, or that I am the contrary. I, and others who support
my contention, can enjoy an Irish programme with as much enthusiasm as
any son of Erin, in its due place and at its proper time. The fact remains that
it was essentially an Australian night, yet no Australian item was included.—
Yours, etc.,
A. J. MORGAN,
Essendon, 28/7/19.
7th Battalion.
CATHOLIC SOLDIERS' WELCOME HOME.
(1919, August 2). Advocate (Melbourne, Vic. : 1868 - 1954), p. 13.
http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article170946120
To the Editor of the "Advocate."
Sir,—In reading over Mr, A. J. Morgan's letter in "The Advocate" of July
19th I was amazed at its inconsistency. He states that at the Catholic Welcome
Home to Catholic soldiers, sailors, and nurses, the place of the Australian flag
was usurped by the Union Jack, and, for a few minutes, by the Irish flag.
When Mr. A. J. Morgan landed in Melbourne and received his Australian
welcome home, he should have observed the Union Jack floating from the
top of the Melbourne Town Hall in place of the Australian flag. I have
not read that he protested.
Furthermore, on similar occasions. he should have observed that hundreds
of Australian soldiers wore badges whose colours were red, white, and
blue, which have an English origin, and in which there is nothing distinctively
Australian. Yet I have not read that he protested; certainly, if he had
written to the "Age," "Argus", or "Herald" about the matter, his letter
was not published. En route in the welcome home processions,
as well as at the receptions to returned Australian soldiers in
town halls, etc., "God Save the King" was played or sung; yet he made no
suggestion that one of our many— though none official—National Anthems
could have been rendered. If he had carefully examined the
Australian flag, he would have found it is a Union Jack, bordered on It
outer, middle, and lower sides by bunting or other material, with a red
or blue background, in which are inserted a number of stars representing
the Southern Cross. The upper and principal portion of this flag is a
Union Jack. How, then, in the name of common sense, could the Union Jack
usurp the Union Jack?
The above description of the Australian flag reminds me: Certain rabid
Imperialists have lately displayed a so-called Irish flag, also with the
Union Jack in its upper and principal corner, next the flagstaff. To try to
incorporate the flag of lreland's oppressor and enemy in an Irish flag is
the greatest insult that can be offered to the latter. It is as great an
atrocity as if a person were to cut off a man's head and put a wooden
head in its place. Whatever the Union Jack may symbolise in other
countries, in Ireland it has always been the symbol of dire oppression, unrelenting
tyranny, of a governmental policy which would crush out the very
first principles of freedom and justice; there it is the banner of slavery, not
of freedom. Accordingly, its appearance on an Irish flag is an outrage on
civilisation and a disgraceful violation of just rules governing the use of
flags. Mr. A. J. Morgan seems to forget he was privileged to be present at a
Catholic welcome home to Catholic soldiers, sailors, and nurses. As the vast
majority of Catholics in Australia are Irish or of Irish descent, and because
the Catholic Church in this southern land was mainly built up by the Irish
race—(the contribution of Englishmen to its foundation and progress is negligible
In comparison)—it is most appropriate that the Irish flag should have a
special place of honour in all Catholic gatherings where flags are
displayed; and never should the Union Jack be allowed to usurp its place. At
the Catholic welcome home In the Melbourne Town Hall, which his Grace
Dr. Mannix—who is a great Irishman as well as a great Australian—honoured
with his presence, it was most fitting that the Irish flag should precede
him to the platform, and be given there a place of honour apart from
the other flags shown. For the aforesaid reasons, also, Irish songs should
have been rendered, and "God Save Ireland" fittingly concluded the programme.
If Mr. A. J. Morgan's motto is: "Everything in its own time and in its
own place," I sincerely hope he will carry it out in practice. When Australia
has a distinctively national flag, and distinctive colours, like other nations,
as France, Ireland, and the United States, then he can write with
some show of reason and consistency, but even then it would be most appropriate
that an Irish flag should be placed alongside a real Australian flag
in every Catholic gathering. —Yours, etc.,
MIDHE.*
August 3rd, 1919.
To the Editor of the “Advocate.” (1919, August 9). Advocate
(Melbourne, Vic. : 1868 - 1954), p. 16.
http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article170946359
* ie, Meath, a county in Ireland.
CATHOLIC SOLDIERS' WELCOME HOME.
To the Editor of "The Advocate."
Sir,—I did not expect to have to write again, but it seems I must write
more directly in order to justify my original remarks. Much of what Mr,
Carroll writes this week is, in a general way, true; but there can always be
an exception, especially when the circumstances justify it. I had no desire
to belittle the splendid efforts of Mrs. Knowles and her able assistants; my
object was solely to offer a suggestion in view of the fact that it is proposed
to hold another "Welcome Home." And so, what I have been endeavouring
to convey I will now state categorically:—
1. It was an Australian and military function.
2. We are all ready enough to cry, "Australia First," but too few put it into practice.
3. We all honour the Irish-born Sinn Feiner for defending his views and placing
Ireland before all else.
But the Australian (even though he be of Irish origin, like Mr. Carroll and myself)
who puts even Ireland before Australia must stand convicted of inconsistency.
He praises the Irishman who puts Ireland first, yet he himself is contented
with putting his own second. My intention in writing was in order
to develop a deeper sentiment in Australian affairs, not to cast reflections
on others, or to open a controversy. Hence, for my part I am satisfied,
and trust that the correspondence will end here. I hope, however, that
it will incite the lukewarm Australian to put Australia first every time, and
then, if he likes, let him place Ireland a good second to his own.—Yours, etc.,
A. J. MORGAN,
7th Battalion.
Essendon, 9/8/19.
P.S.—The anonymous remarks of "Midhe" are either contrary to facts
or irrelevant.
CATHOLIC SOLDIERS' WELCOME HOME.
(1919, August 16). Advocate
(Melbourne, Vic. : 1868 - 1954), p. 24.
http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article170946551
War Service Commemorated
Essendon Gazette Roll of Honour Wounded
Regimental Register
Welcome Home 7 Nov 1918
Comments (0)
You don't have permission to comment on this page.